Tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 are on FTP

[Vincent van Ravesteijn]

Hi all,

The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at

ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/

As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before
announcing the release.

Vincent

[Pavel Sanda]

Post by Vincent van Ravesteijn
Hi all,
The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/
As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before
announcing the release.

Standard ubuntu install is no more able to produce pdf from math manual due to missing mathtools.sty.
Not sure how much is this package exotic or it's just my install at my institute.
P

[Pavel Sanda]

Post by Pavel Sanda

Post by Vincent van Ravesteijn
Hi all,
The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/
As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before
announcing the release.

Standard ubuntu install is no more able to produce pdf from math manual due to missing mathtools.sty.
Not sure how much is this package exotic or it's just my install at my institute.

That said, it works just fine on gentoo where mathtools.sty is part of texlive-latexrecommended-2012
so most probably only debian/ubuntu packagers need to add additional package dependency.

Otherwise I don't see any other problem except that's time to leave homes and
screens for the full eclipse now!

Pavel

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

Post by Pavel Sanda
Standard ubuntu install is no more able to produce pdf from math manual due to missing mathtools.sty.
Not sure how much is this package exotic or it's just my install at my institute.

On my local ubuntu install it is OK, but I agree it needs to be put in
dependencies.

This prompted my to look at Math.lyx and notice that all/most tabulars
use \raisebox in ERT to produce proper spacing. Moreover, they use ugly
plain tabulars that no book in prints would ever use.

Therefore I tried to see what happens if I just use a formal table (see
attached). Is there a reason why we should keep the current form?

JMarc

[Uwe Stöhr]

Post by Vincent van Ravesteijn
Hi all,
The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/
As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before announcing the release.

Hello Vincent,

you can find the installers for LyX 2.1.0 here:

https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/TestVersions/

(I'll add the installer improvements we discussed the next days as soon as I find the time.)

regards Uwe

[Vincent van Ravesteijn]

Post by Uwe Stöhr

Post by Vincent van Ravesteijn
Hi all,
The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/
As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before
announcing the release.

Hello Vincent,
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/TestVersions/
(I'll add the installer improvements we discussed the next days as
soon as I find the time.)
regards Uwe

Thank you,

I'm downloading now.

Vincent

[Uwe Stöhr]

Post by Uwe Stöhr
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/TestVersions/
(I'll add the installer improvements we discussed the next days as soon as I find the time.)

Hello Vincent,

I found now the time to implement the 3 most urgent things we discussed:
www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/62cbf893d2341543c37ed210fce5ac5ac9176b8a/lyxgit

I built a new installer with that for LyX 2.1.0, you can get it from here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.1.0/

I would recommend to put that installer on ftp.lyx.org and remove my first version because with the
new installer one can install LyX 2.1.0 over an existing LyX 2.1 beta or RC.
For beta versions this is not recommended as these were not adapted correctly in the registry but
for RC1 installing over it works fine here on 2 test PCs (Win XP and Win 7 64bit). However, I guess
who installed a beta would also have installed an RC and the installer for the RC forced a
reinstallation of LyX.

thanks and regards
Uwe

[José Matos]

Post by Vincent van Ravesteijn
Hi all,
The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/
As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before
announcing the release.
Vincent

Packages for Fedora are available at the updates-testing for F19 and F20 (and rawhide aka devel).

The same packages can be built for EPEL 6 and 7. (Fedora repository for RHEL 6 and RHEL 7).

[Stephan Witt]

Post by Vincent van Ravesteijn
Hi all,
The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/
As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before announcing the release.

The package for mac is here:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg.sig

Stephan

[Jerry]

Post by Stephan Witt

Post by Vincent van Ravesteijn
Hi all,
The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/
As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before announcing the release.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg.sig
Stephan

Dumb question no doubt, but what is the purpose of the .sig file? Is this related to codesigning?
Jerry

[Pavel Sanda]

Post by Jerry

Post by Stephan Witt
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg.sig
Stephan

Dumb question no doubt, but what is the purpose of the .sig file? Is this related to codesigning?

Yes. We have paragraph about this in download section of our web.

It helps to ensure that the file's contents has not been changed by someone else than
by the one owing private key. You might know about the cases when attackers get into
ftp infrastructure of some projects and added backdoors to the code released. This
helps until they also succesfully hack into computers of the people who do the releases ;)

Pavel

[Stephan Witt]

Post by Pavel Sanda

Post by Jerry

Post by Stephan Witt
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg.sig
Stephan

Dumb question no doubt, but what is the purpose of the .sig file? Is this related to codesigning?

Yes. We have paragraph about this in download section of our web.
It helps to ensure that the file's contents has not been changed by someone else than
by the one owing private key. You might know about the cases when attackers get into
ftp infrastructure of some projects and added backdoors to the code released. This
helps until they also succesfully hack into computers of the people who do the releases ;)
Pavel

But it's not the key for Apples gatekeeper code signing.

Mac binaries may come as singed executables with an key
compiled in to ensure it's from a known and legitimate
apple developer and that it's contents was not modified
on the way from the "work bench" to the end user.

That's the same idea but the developer has to pay for it.

Stephan

[Vincent van Ravesteijn]

Post by Stephan Witt

Post by Vincent van Ravesteijn
Hi all,
The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/
As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before announcing the release.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg.sig
Stephan

Thank you.

Vincent

[Liviu Andronic]

Post by Vincent van Ravesteijn
Hi all,
The tarballs for LyX 2.1.0 can be found at

Ubuntu packages are now available on the PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/release

Liviu

Post by Vincent van Ravesteijn
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/lyx-2.1.0/
As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before
announcing the release.
Vincent

[Alessandro Di Federico]

On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:47:13 +0200

Post by Vincent van Ravesteijn
As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before
announcing the release.

Hi! When are you going to announce the release? In a few weeks we're
going to have the fourth LyX Workshop here at POuL and we are willing
to present LyX 2.1, however it's a problem if the official download
page still offers LyX 2.0.7.

--
Ale

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

Post by Alessandro Di Federico
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:47:13 +0200

Post by Vincent van Ravesteijn
As usual I'll wait for the packagers to provide the binaries before
announcing the release.

Hi! When are you going to announce the release? In a few weeks we're
going to have the fourth LyX Workshop here at POuL and we are willing
to present LyX 2.1, however it's a problem if the official download
page still offers LyX 2.0.7.

Hi Alessandro,

It is supposed to be today, I think.

JMarc